Earlier routing research. This broader snapshot includes CCTP and specialist-client routes that are not enabled in the current prototype. Open the current swap.lightning-network.ro planner →
swap.lightning-network.ro
Pivot comparisonRoute explorerRESEARCH · 06 NOV 2026

Native coins · Cross-chain routing

Choose the pivot
for the route.

Use Litecoin to connect Monero, TRX to connect swap protocols, or native USDC on Avalanche for a stable route to Solana. Compare the complete route before choosing a pivot.

Native assets with explicit networks 9 endpoints · 36 pair combinations Local HTML · No wallet connection Research snapshot, not live prices

01 / Choose an intermediary

Compare the pivots

Connectivity first. Then the combined fees, market depth and time spent in the intermediate asset.

Intermediary assets: connectivity, cost considerations and limitations. All values are qualitative research assessments, not live quotes.
Pivot assetWhere it helpsCost considerationsExposure & constraintsAssessment
BNBBNB Smart Chain · native
THORChain ↔ ChainflipAnother common native asset with routes into Solana and Ethereum stablecoins.Chainflip assets ↗Native BSC gasReserve part of the BNB output to fund the next transfer. Compare actual liquidity and protocol costs against TRX.Explicit price protection requiredChainflip documents no default oracle-based slippage protection for BNB. A minimum output must be set deliberately.Additional candidate

Compare only with explicit minimum-output limits.

USDTTRON · TRC-20
THORChain ↔ ChainflipA common asset and network connecting Litecoin routes to Solana stablecoins.Chainflip assets ↗Measure TRON resource costsAccount for outbound charges, the next transfer and token execution resources. Do not assume a TRC-20 transfer is nearly free.Dollar exposure, issuer controlsUSDT depeg/freeze risk plus both protocols’ settlement risks. The next leg may need TRX for fees.Stable connector

Compare against Ethereum stablecoin routes for the actual amount.

USDCEthereum · ERC-20
Broad common liquidityAvailable on THORChain and Chainflip. CCTP supplies another path to native USDC on Solana.Circle CCTP ↗Gas can dominate small swapsInclude ETH gas, any approval, source transfer and destination costs. Quote quality can outweigh gas for larger trades.Dollar exposure, issuer controlsRequires ETH fee funding unless a supported route explicitly covers it. CCTP adds Circle’s attestation dependency.Useful alternative

Stable, well-connected; cost depends on size and network conditions.

USDCSolana · SPL token
Solana destination and local hubChainflip, CCTP and local Solana DEX routes. Does not itself connect directly to BasicSwap’s XMR/LTC market.Jupiter routing ↗Efficient local settlementInclude priority fees and token-account creation where required. Cross-chain provider charges still apply.Exact network mattersUSDC on Solana cannot be spent as USDC on Ethereum. A transfer or swap must connect those endpoints.Destination hub

Excellent to compare locally; not a universal connector for native coins.

BitcoinBTC · on-chain
Broad native-coin connectivityShared by the main swap protocols and relevant to Lightning conversion.Lightning Loop ↗Additional settlement and miner feesCan add costly intermediate movements. Actual fees vary with transaction size and fee market conditions.Retained as an endpointThe route explorer excludes BTC as an intermediary by default. Lightning routes may still require it.Excluded as pivot

Your chosen routing constraint, not a claim that BTC is always expensive.

Recommendation, not a price ranking. LTC connects Monero; native TRX connects THORChain and Chainflip; native Avalanche USDC connects THORChain to Circle CCTP. The cheapest route remains quote-dependent.


02 / Explore the coverage

What can connect to what?

Choose a pair or select a table cell. The route panel shows a candidate path through existing integrations, with the intermediary assets made explicit.

BTC can still be the source or destination.

Both directions are structural candidates. Each needs its own quote, limits, liquidity and chain-status check.
DSingle protocolASpecialist atomic swapMComposed routeLLightning research
19 single-protocol pairs2 atomic pairs7 composed pairs8 Lightning-dependent

Try a route without an on-chain BTC intermediary


03 / Compare the complete route

Cheap transfers are only
one part of the price.

The winning route maximizes net destination output for the amount being swapped, while meeting the user’s settlement and trust constraints.

  1. 01
    Start with net output.

    Include each protocol’s liquidity fees, price impact, outbound charges, provider charges and separately paid network costs. Avoid deducting costs already included in a quote twice.

  2. 02
    Price every intermediate movement.

    The first protocol pays out. The next needs a new deposit or transfer. Stablecoin token transfers may also need TRX, SOL or ETH in the user’s wallet.

  3. 03
    Re-quote after the first settlement.

    A sequential route’s second quote can expire before the first leg finishes. If the user declines the new quote, they keep the intermediate asset.


04 / Follow the evidence

Primary sources

Documentation checked 06 November 2026 · linked pages may change